Thursday, November 19, 2015

Ben Carson? Shock factor or legitimate candidate?

According to a poll published in the New York Times, Ben Carson took the lead of the Republican primary voters after the last debate, edging out Donald Trump for the first time in months. A month ago, we were calling Donald Trump the “unlikely frontrunner” as he surprised political scientists and pollsters over and over again with successful GOP support.

Now, that title seems like an understatement for a retired pediatric neurosurgeon who catapulted himself into the political arena 2 years ago by criticizing President Barack Obama's policies on healthcare, taxation, and the national debt at one of the few non-political events in Washington D.C., National Prayer Breakfast while standing next to President Obama.

While the speech went viral, commentators on both sides of the political spectrum criticized Carson for his distasteful behavior and outright rudeness. But there was one viewer who both identified with Carson’s sentiments and praised his impudence: Rush Limbaugh.

Carson has had the Limbaugh seal of approval for over two years now, as the talk show host has been urging Carson to run for president since the whole charade. I should’ve known then that Carson would be a rival to Trump as the best producer of shocking and offensive quotes; yet here I am, five months into his campaign, still appalled by every ignorant thing that comes out of his mouth.

While analyzing Carson’s campaign we could point out his lack of experience in any elected office, but he has retorted that that is one of his strongest qualities as a candidate: he is not a politician. In his typical scriptural rhetoric, he said “The arc was built by amateurs while the Titanic was built by professionals.” So we can just leave that component of his campaign alone for now. We could look at his questionable relationship with Mannatech, Inc., a company that produces dietary supplements and has been the subject of several deceptive-marketing lawsuits in Texas over claims that its products could cure autism and cancer. However, the CNBC GOP Debate Moderators beat us to that punch and Carson is already trying to distance his name from the company.

Instead, let us focus on the controversial and undeniably offensive quotes that capture Carson’s platform. Running unapologetically on his faith, Carson has repeatedly highlighted his strong opinions about abortion and homosexuality. As far as republican platforms go, that is unsurprising. However, Carson has taken in about 100 steps further (and too far, for the record) by equating abortion to slavery and claiming that prison can turn you gay.

On NBC’s Meet the Press in October, Carson compared women who terminate their unwanted pregnancies to slave-owners who “thought that they had the right to do whatever they wanted to that slave.” Then on CNN Carson said that homosexuality is a choice, citing people who “go into prison straight – and when they come out, they’re gay” as proof. In response to the Oregon shooting earlier this fall and to back is gun-rights platform, Carson explained on CNN that gun control was the fatal flaw that allowed Hiller to rise to power, saying “I think the likelihood of Hitler being able to accomplish his goals would have been greatly diminished if the people had been armed,” Carson said. “There’s a reason these dictatorial people take the guns first.” 

This was not the first time Carson has utilized comparisons to the Holocaust to make a point and when he was pressed on the validity or morality of these statements he simplistically explained that he has heard members of the Jewish community make these same comparisons.

During an interview on Meet the Press in September, Carson now infamously said that a Muslim could not become the president of the United States. “I would not advocate that we put a Muslim in charge of this nation,” he said. “I absolutely would not agree with that.” Instead of apologizing, Carson went on to explain his remarks. In order for a Muslim to become president, he said, “you have to reject the tenets of Islam.”

Where do these comments by Carson leave him in the media and the polls? Well, although late night hosts are having a field day with his quote-worthy mess ups and their material is practically writing itself, the mainstream media has not lost any respect for this radical candidate. Carson has only gotten better polling numbers and more air time with every controversial statement. From this case study and what we have seen from Rush Limbaugh, it isn't hard to come to the conclusion that the key to more press is the shock factor and sensationalism is taking over mainstream media. 


Thursday, October 15, 2015

Framing THE E-mail Situation

Earlier this year, March to be specific, Hillary Clinton got herself into some deep water when she exclusively used her personal email accounts on a non-government, private email server for Secretary of State business.  While this use of the private email account/server was allowed under the State Department and was supposedly only done for convenience, the story exploded on just about every media outlet and has yet to leave national attention. With it’s timely occurrence, against the backdrop of Clinton’s 2016 presidential campaign, the controversy served well as fuel for opponents in the race and as a hot story for the media.
            Because the email scandal immediately conjures up suspicions of a government official who has already been the center of many scandals concerning national security and overall public support for cautious behavior of the Secretary of State, it was not difficult for the media to frame this as a major national scandal that required immediate disciplinary action. As George Lakoff explains in his book Thinking Points, “political framing” of topics is applied cognitive science that facilitates our basic interactions with the world. He goes on to say that political disputes are sometimes about how frames interact and whether one frame takes priority over another, using the controversy around the Bush administration’s illegal spying on U.S. citizens during the War on Terror as an example. He explains that “spying” comes with a frame that the public already understands and has predisposed views on. However, the frames established by the War on Terror invoked a resonating message: “bringing criminals to justice.”
            Unfortunately for Hillary, her flounder was framed much differently. While the spying done under the Bush administration was controversial, it was framed as beneficial to the safety of the American people; Clinton’s use of a private email server has been framed as a serious problem surrounding classified information that could potentially put Americans at risk.
            Clinton and her team have worked relentlessly to do damage control on this issue. Clinton addressed the issue in March, to the United Nations. Clinton defended herself on August 8th saying that classified materials were not exchanged on the personal server. When the media hype did not dissolve, Hillary put out a formal apology in early September. Experts say that there’s no legal issue with her use of the servers and her actions do not stand out against those of past Secretaries of State. So why is the country still buzzing with talk about her emails? Why was Hillary still defending herself at the Democratic Debate on Tuesday night? Because the media did a successful job of framing this as an issue of public concern.
            Controlling the damage of this scandal is difficult because reframing the issue could be even more detrimental. If the administration downplays the immediacy of the concern or the severity of leaks of national secrets, she will not look like a competent Secretary of State. However, if discussion of the scandal continues, her race for the White House will be over. What’s a Clinton to do?


Lakoff, George. “Frames and Brains,” Thinking Points. New York: Farrar, Staus, Giroux, 2006.

Carol D. Leonnig (September 1, 2015). "Clinton, using private server, wrote and sent e-mails now deemed classified". Washington Post.

"NSA head: Clinton server a 'priority' target for foreign agencies". TheHill.

Tuesday, September 15, 2015

Bernie Sanders: king of social media

The concept of journalists acting as gatekeepers in the news is one that is as old as print itself. The media sector has been called the fourth estate of government for decades because of its role in politics and public opinion. However, the days of "Extra! Extra! Read all about it!" are close to over, as the news industry is shifting and media is changing.

There was a time when journalists acted like the gatekeeper of news by deciding whose voice was heard in the reporting. They decided what stories were newsworthy. They chose which candidates would make the front page. But social media has completely upended and eroded that power. As the news cycle has become continuous and the role of sites like Facebook, Buzzfeed, Twitter, and Tumblr has increased, campaigns have drastically changed.

We saw this shift with the Barack Obama campaigns of 2008 and 2012. His campaign team knew how to rally voters and raise funds with tools like email, Twitter, and Facebook. Just last year, Barack Obama mobilized Americans to sign up for Obamacare with a quirky and fun Buzzfeed video. This is how candidates are reaching, not only young voters, but active voters.

Now, in 2015, the social media king is Bernie Sanders. Like most candidates, Bernie's team sends out daily Call-to-Action emails highlighting his action in the Senate and his presidential platform. However, unlike many other candidates on either side of the race, Bernie's popularity with the youngest section of eligible voters is showcased all over Facebook, Twitter, and, most effectively, Tumblr. 

Though the national polls and mainstream media outlets still doubt Bernie Sanders' potential as a legitimate candidate, you would be hard pressed to find a Facebook feed that didn't have at least one 20-something user posting about the Vermont Senator. In fact, during the duration of his campaign, his Twitter and Facebook pages have gone from unfollowed and unliked to surpassing his rival candidates. 

Bernie Sanders’ Facebook page has 1.4 million likes, according to a Reuters report. This is more than his Democratic rival, Hillary Clinton. Other pages like “Feel the Bern,” “I’m Ready for Bernie Sanders,” and several hundred regional pages, have their own massive followings. Facebook is becoming a great tool for crowd rallying because it spreads information about events and news rapidly. It is also a forum that opens up discussion and deliberation about topics ranging from high school gossip to political platforms.


According to Twitter, 446,000 users are “Feeling the Bern,” and following the Senator. This is more than Jeb Bush and Chris Christie’s followers combined. Twitter is a great venue for sharing short quotes from rallies, interviews, or pieces of policy quickly and often with literally hundreds of thousands of supporters. Users also have the option of filtering tweets with hashtags like #feelthebern and #bernie2016. However, the real influence of Twitter on the 2016 White House race has changed dramatically with the announcement that Twitter Inc. will be collaborating with mobile payments company Square Inc. to allow users to request and submit donations to campaigns via “$cashtags.” This will just add another means for Sanders’ team to rack in small donations in large quantities.

The role of a popular blogging site, Tumblr, in this campaign is particularly apparent in the case of Sanders. With charts comparing Sanders to Clinton in a light far more flattering on him circulating the site, Tumblr has become a means of spreading Sanders' platform and highlighting his strengths. Trendy social media sites are increasing Sanders' name and face recognition simply with memes, photos, and catchy hashtags like #feelthebern. 

Just like on Twitter, Facebook, and Tumblr, Sanders is dominating the political scene on the popular site, Reddit. The subreddit /r/sandersforpresident has over 64,000 subscribers, while r/HillaryClinton has 370.

The Hill columnist Brent Budowsky points out that Bernie’s brilliant use of social media, which couples well with his “large numbers of devoted supports and excited activists,” that helps Sanders repeatedly drive crowds to his public events, mobilize donors, and eventual bring out “above-average turnout” at voting. Budowsky compares the 2016 campaign, in regard to social media, to the day after the Nixon-Kennedy televised debates; everything has changed for elections and politics will never be the same.

Numerous political analysts have cited Barack Obama’s use of social media to pull in small donations as one of the game-changing aspects of the 2008 race. In May, Sanders told The Daily Beast, that he sees Obama’s 2008 campaign as “one of the greatest campaigns in American history.” It’s not hard to recognize that Sanders has been taking a few lessons about social media out of Obama’s book.


http://blogs.reuters.com/talesfromthetrail/2015/09/15/how-sanders-has-used-social-media-to-fuel-his-rise/